When thinking about the nature of anime and manga studies as a discreet subject area, it is certainly possible to raise a whole range of different questions. For example, in a chapter in the recent 2nd edition of the definitive essay collection Introducing Japanese Popular Culture, Mark McLelland highlights some of the unique challenges of “managing manga studies in the convergent classroom“. Similarly, in the latest version of the International Center for Japanese Studies report Japanese Studies Around the World (2024), Yoshikuni Igarashi presents an overview of “the state of manga studies in North America“. And, in the one of the leading journals in the broader Japanese Studies field, Ryotaro Mihara, in the provocatively-titled Decolonising anime studies: A prolegomenon makes the argument “that the field of Anglophone anime studies should itself be scrutinised in relation to how it canonises a specific ‘style of thought’ (as Said terms it) in understanding anime at the expense of anime itself”.
At the same time, even as we ask these kinds of questions about anime and manga studies, it is also crucial to ask other questions – that are not as much about general and abstract concepts as they are about the specific activities that we label “anime and manga studies”, primarily, teaching, and scholarly publications. Asking certain concrete questions lets us essentially operationalize the abstract concepts and treat “anime and manga studies” as something that can be not just defined, but itself studied.




One such question, perhaps one of the most straight-forward questions to ask about any new developing academic field, is simply how is new scholarship in the field actually published – in what formats, and by what publishers. Is the field dominated by just a small group of publishers? Or are publications dispersed among many? A prominent study that asks this question is The oligopoly of academic publishers in the Digital Era (PLoS, 2015). Critiques of the “oligopoly” are also frequent – one excellent example is the chapter by Paige Mann, Scholarship in a globalized world: The publishing ecosystem and alternatives to the Oligopoly, in the 2022 essay collection Diversity, Inclusion, and Decolonization Practical Tools for Improving Teaching, Research, and Scholarship (Rutgers University Press).
(more…)

The organizers of the San Diego Comic Convention / Comic-Con International have announced the titles and individuals nominated for the
Among the creators who have essentially defined the course of Japanese comics and animation through the entire second half of the 20th century, and now, for two decades into the 21st, Leiji Matsumoto ranks at the very top – second only to Osamu Tezuka. But, for many reasons, audiences outside of Japan are still largely unfamiliar with much of Matsumoto’s work, have only a vague awareness of it – or are not even aware that Matsumoto was the director in the first place. And this is despite the place that Space Battleshi Yamato holds in the history of anime – and its adaptation as Star Blazers does in the history of Japanese animation in the U.S.



Recently, the judging panel for the 2016 Will Eisner Comic Industry Awards, which will be presented in July at Comic-Con International: San Diego and serve to “[highlight] the best publications and creators in comics and graphic novels” from around the world announced 

